About That Shop Rule... D:

[Angel]

It's just so... bleh.

I think it's a very dumb rule and seriously complicates the whole user exchange process. Our threads start to drop, but we can't post for a while... Even when we do post within the rule guidelines, people get mad at us. *has happened to me before*

I don't see what's so wrong with making a quick, one-time thread and then leaving it to die.

I just think it'd be so nice to be able to do this again.


I mean, even just a sub-forum made for these kinds of threads would make it so much easier.

Please? D:

[Squid]

You know you can delete your last post and then post again.

It'll get moved back up to the top of the forum and you won't have a string of posts made by yourself.

Just a suggestion.

[Chu]

That's what I do, Squid. It's simple and doesn't make it look like trash.

I'm fine with the rule. It's really annoying to sift through thread after thread when you want to buy something.There's a lot less clutter with just one thread per user too, rather than seeing multiple threads from multiple users saying "SOLD" or whatever.

[Rei Ann]

I like the one shop per user, have that many quick threads ust clutters the exchange up.

[Arikana]

It cause a lot of clutter to sieve through, and with all the on-going business of three of five of the admins and mods it'll help to keep clear of spam.

Plus, this won't be a problem when the market forum becomes more active...one day. XP;;

[Kira Bella]

I prefer one shop per user. Mainly because I can track whom I am selling to, what price, and when. And like the others have said, we don't have 500 + threads from different people all trying to sell at once.

I mean, if I see something in a title that gets me in there, I will look and almost always buy if I can afford it. But I would hate to have to look thru, for example, 3 of your threads, all selling something different, and then another of your threads near the bottom, as your main.

And even if you had a subforum for the threads, isn't that like pushing it off to the side and forgotten anyway? You want them noticed, but maybe what you are WANTING to sell isn't what IS selling, and that is the reason the threads fall to the bottom.

Though your suggestion is vaild and has a very good point, I think more users would rather only seeing one thread per user. Kind of helps in keeping Midorea clutter and spam free don't ya think?

[Angel]

[Chu]

It can reduce spam. :3 Less threads = less threads to watch. If I have to skim over ten topics, I'll keep a closer eye on the possible spam than if there are fifteen or twenty to read. D;

[Angel]

But if the spam is non-existent, it can't be reduced. =o

Cuz' we don't have much of a spam problem right now, so more leeway could be allowed without sacrificing integrity. :3

[Chu]

Haha, but I'm lazy too. ;D

[Angel]

But now you haz LUF to whore out for spam control? >D

Kidding! XD


Meh, I'm starting to not like my own suggestion now. Sure, it'd be a lot easier if the rule was changed, but... it'd start to get clutterfied. I can see it. =o

[Chu]

Yes, walk into the light, Angel!

._.

Seriously though, I'm glad you can see the other perspective of it. xP

[Angel]

Grah, I'm pretty flexible on this kinda' stoof.

I guess I'm one of the few out there who can see he's wrong... and admit it. XD

[Chu]

O: Oh. My. God.

Are you sure you're human? *pokes*


Hehe, I'm going to sleep now. Good night.

[Angel]

No. =o

*little alien busts out of chest*

Grawhrinlgrahlash! D<


That was... awkwardly random. XD

We should really get back on topic now. @.@


When you get back online tomorrow, that is. XD

Good night! :D